I proffered this before but I don’t know what came of it.
If I submit a caption, with an original idea in it, it soon gets swallowed up by all the following ones, so that my original caption is probably on page 2 or 3 quite quickly.
Now, people appear to vote for captions on the first two or so pages - rarely going further, it appears.
If someone copies my original point and submits a captiion a couple of hours after mine, then anyone new, looking at captions to vote on, would see the later one (who may have stolen my idea) first! My original one is long lost but this new “upstart”, having taken my idea on board, appears - to the viewer scrolling down - to be “original” just because it is the first caption using the idea. The credit for the idea would now appear to go to the “upstart” because his will be seen first. Mine will be “old” - buried away in page 3 or 4 by now. I will have lost the copyright of originality effectively.
As I said before, The Edinburgh Evening News used to have (not now, it’s now rubbish) the newest caption right at the top. And it STAYED there for the duration of the competition. THey all stayed in chronological order. Anyone stealing an idea would be much further down the page and people scrolling down would recognise the older one as being just that - older than the original.
So they were in chronological order for the entire day. Then the next day, a new caption appeared, and the yesterday caption is consigned to history (but accessible by clicking on the yesterday photo which would be available to see, along with all the captions submitted incidentally).
However you couldn’t vote on a yesterday photo, only the current one.
That means that captions for the one day, stay there for one day. The yesterday one is old hat, and not votable on (but you can SEE them by clicking on yesterday’s photo).
That means the original ideas showed early chronologically and would get the credit as being original, and not got swamped onto a page 4 or something. Which is far fairer than it is today I think (sorry Chris!).
Just wondered if I could revive that thinking!
Grover D. Bluebottle IV
