![]()
BREAKING NEWS: Introducing “Caption Time Machine” on caption.me! ![]()
![]()
Hey Caption Connoisseurs! ![]()
Do you ever find yourself wondering, “How did they come up with THAT genius caption?!” Well, the wait is over! Starting TODAY, we are super pumped to roll out our latest and most anticipated feature: the Caption Time Machine! ![]()
What is Caption Time Machine? It’s a nifty little function that allows you to see the entire evolutionary journey of a caption, from its humble beginnings to its moment of glory! Watch as a simple one-liner morphs into a caption of sheer brilliance! Witness the edits, the rewrites, and the AHA! moments that led to the winning caption you see today! ![]()
![]()
Why should you be excited?
- Learn & Improve: See how top captioners tweak their lines to clinch the top spot!

- The Drama: Experience the ups and downs, the tweaks and turns that a caption goes through before making it to the leaderboard.

- The Intrigue: Reveal sneaky edits that concealed foul play!
How to Use it? Simply click on a caption to view the caption page. An edited caption will look like this:
So, go ahead, click the Show History button. A glorious timeline of edits will unfold before your eyes!
Note: Time Machine is currently only available for captions submitted after September 23, 2023.
So what are you waiting for? Take a trip back in time and witness the making of caption history!
Ready to dive in? Head over to caption.me and let the Caption Time Machine blow your mind! ![]()
We’re stoked to see how this new feature will enhance your caption competition experience. As always, we love to hear from you, so don’t hesitate to drop us a comment or feedback.
Happy Captioning! ![]()
![]()
Cheers, The caption.me Team ![]()
PS. The above announcement was written by ChatGPT 4 (artificial intelligence), given the simple prompt “write a fun announcement for a new feature of a caption competition website. The feature allows users to see the historic edits of a caption.” I made some minor tweaks to tailor it, but otherwise I thought the AI did well. What do you reckon? A bit overzealous? ![]()


